2005 Nissan Murano vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Nissan Murano is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (221 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Murano weights approximately 409 kg more than 2003 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Murano (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Murano | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | Murano | Megane |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1804 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.9 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.8 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |