2005 Nissan Murano vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Murano. (246 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Murano.
Because 2005 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Murano | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Nissan | SsangYong |
| Model | Murano | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
