2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 1964 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (120 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 953 kg more than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Reliant Scimitar. (190 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Reliant Scimitar.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 1964 Reliant Scimitar | |
| Make | Nissan | Reliant |
| Model | Pathfinder | Scimitar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1003 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2340 mm |
