2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Pontiac Grand Am would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. (175 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 619 kg more than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am. (285 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Nissan | Pontiac |
Model | Pathfinder | Grand Am |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 3349 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2033 kg | 1414 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 54 L |