2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (391 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 76 kg more than 2010 Dodge Ram.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (552 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (395 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Pathfinder | Ram |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3949 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 552 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2036 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 98 L |