2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 794 kg more than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (395 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Pathfinder | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3949 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 474 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2036 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 125 L |