2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 897 kg more than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2011 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Pathfinder | Polo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 175 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1088 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |