2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2012 Ford Edge
To start off, 2012 Ford Edge is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,948 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Edge (285 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Edge should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 193 kg more than 2012 Ford Edge.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Edge. (343 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Edge.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2012 Ford Edge | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Pathfinder | Edge |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 343 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2033 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4679 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |