2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2013 Volvo XC60. (237 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo XC60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 245 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo XC60. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Pathfinder | XC60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3949 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 395 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 96 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2036 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |