2005 Nissan Sentra vs. 1978 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Nissan Sentra is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,967 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Sentra (126 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1978 Toyota Celica. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1978 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 55 kg more than 1978 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Sentra (175 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Toyota Celica. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Sentra | 1978 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Sentra | Celica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1171 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |