2005 Nissan Terrano vs. 2003 Rover City
To start off, 2005 Nissan Terrano is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Rover City would be higher. At 2,954 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Terrano (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2003 Rover City. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Terrano should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover City. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 854 kg more than 2003 Rover City. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Rover City. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Terrano (328 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover City. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Terrano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover City.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Terrano | 2003 Rover City | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Terrano | City |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2954 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 84 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1894 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 37 L |
