2005 Nissan Titan vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Titan | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2181 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 64 L |