2005 Nissan Titan vs. 1993 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1993 Opel Omega. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1993 Opel Omega.
Because 2005 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Opel Omega. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Titan | 1993 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Nissan | Opel |
| Model | Titan | Omega |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 514 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 75 L |
