2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 698 kg more than 2000 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Titan | Mark II |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 70 L |