2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2002 Rover 25
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 25 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 2002 Rover 25. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2002 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 25. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2002 Rover 25 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Titan | 25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 50 L |