2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2002 Volvo C70
To start off, 2005 Nissan Titan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2002 Volvo C70. (162 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 808 kg more than 2002 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Titan | 2002 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Titan | C70 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 514 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 68 L |
