2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2010 Audi Q7
To start off, 2010 Audi Q7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Audi Q7. (280 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi Q7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi Q7 weights approximately 137 kg more than 2005 Nissan Titan.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi Q7. (360 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi Q7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2010 Audi Q7 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Titan | Q7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 360 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 2345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5088 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1737 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 3002 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 100 L |