2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (400 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Titan. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Titan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 182 kg more than 2005 Nissan Titan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW X6 (609 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Titan. (514 Nm). This means 2010 BMW X6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Titan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Titan | 2010 BMW X6 | |
| Make | Nissan | BMW |
| Model | Titan | X6 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 514 Nm | 609 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 2390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4879 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1689 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2934 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 85 L |
