2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2010 Kia Optima
To start off, 2010 Kia Optima is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2010 Kia Optima. (175 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 758 kg more than 2010 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Optima. (229 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2010 Kia Optima | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Titan | Optima |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 229 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4801 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 62 L |