2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1003 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Titan | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Titan | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 514 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2436 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 40 L |
