2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Titan (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1079 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Titan (514 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Titan | RIO |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 98 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 43 L |