2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 22 kg more than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | X-Trail | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2488 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1842 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3130 mm |
