2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1968 Skoda 1000 MB
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1000 MB would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 498 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB. (75 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1000 MB.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1968 Skoda 1000 MB | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | X-Trail | 1000 MB |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 75 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 787 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 38 L |