2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 180 kg more than 1968 Skoda 1202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | X-Trail | 1202 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |