2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (256 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 300 kg more than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (491 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. 1976 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | X-Trail | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 491 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2830 mm |