2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 435 kg more than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm @ 2850 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | X-Trail | Rapid R |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2850 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 47 L |