2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 185 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | X-Trail | 360 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |