2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2000 Plymouth Neon
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Neon would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2000 Plymouth Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Plymouth Neon. (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Plymouth Neon. 2000 Plymouth Neon has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Plymouth Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2000 Plymouth Neon | |
Make | Nissan | Plymouth |
Model | X-Trail | Neon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2650 mm |