2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 Skoda Fabia. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2003 Skoda Fabia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 155 kg more than 2003 Skoda Fabia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Skoda Fabia (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | X-Trail | Fabia |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1130 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |