2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | X-Trail | Epica |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
