2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | X-Trail | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 109 HP |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |
