2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | X-Trail | Cruze |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 148 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2685 mm |