2005 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2010 Kia Picanto
To start off, 2010 Kia Picanto is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Kia Picanto. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Picanto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 356 kg more than 2010 Kia Picanto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Kia Picanto. (97 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Kia Picanto.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan X-Trail | 2010 Kia Picanto | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | X-Trail | Picanto |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1086 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 929 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 35 L |