2005 Nissan Xterra vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Xterra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Xterra would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 386 kg more than 2005 Nissan Xterra.
Because 2005 Nissan Xterra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Xterra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2005 Nissan Xterra has manual transmission. 2005 Nissan Xterra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Xterra | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Xterra | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2875 mm |
