2005 Noble M12 vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 2005 Noble M12 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Noble M10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Noble M10 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Noble M12 (335 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1999 Noble M10. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1999 Noble M10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Noble M12 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1999 Noble M10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Noble M12 (485 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Noble M10. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Noble M10.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Noble M12 | 1999 Noble M10 | |
Make | Noble | Noble |
Model | M12 | M10 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 485 Nm | 220 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1170 mm |