2005 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Aurora | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5070 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2760 mm |