2005 Opel Astra vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Opel Astra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Opel Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Opel Astra (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Opel Astra should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Astra weights approximately 275 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Astra (142 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Opel Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Opel Astra | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Opel | Riley |
| Model | Astra | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 885 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 25 L |
