2005 Opel Combo vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 2005 Opel Combo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,684 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2005 Opel Combo. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Opel Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Combo weights approximately 175 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Combo (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Opel Combo 1996 Rover 200
Make Opel Rover
Model Combo 200
Year Released 2005 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1684 cc 1395 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1205 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4340 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1810 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2510 mm