2005 Opel Corsa vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2005 Opel Corsa is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1048 kg more than 2005 Opel Corsa.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Opel Corsa | 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Opel | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Corsa | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 178 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2118 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 107 L |
