2005 Opel Omega vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Opel Omega is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Omega weights approximately 844 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Omega (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Opel Omega | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Opel | Zastava |
Model | Omega | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2160 mm |