2005 Peugeot 107 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Peugeot 107. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Peugeot 107 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 392 more horse power than 2005 Peugeot 107. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Peugeot 107. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1546 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 107. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Peugeot 107. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 537 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 107. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 107. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2005 Peugeot 107 has manual transmission. 2005 Peugeot 107 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Peugeot 107 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
| Model | 107 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 459 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 2336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2156 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.1 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 5.5 L/100km | 17.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 93 L |
