2005 Peugeot 206 vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 206 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2005 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 206 (175 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 206 (205 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Peugeot 206 | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | 206 | 145 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1986 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 205 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
