2005 Peugeot 206 vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 206 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 206 (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Peugeot 206 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1997 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 206 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Peugeot 206 | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 206 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 855 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |