2005 Peugeot 206 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Peugeot 206. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Peugeot 206 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2005 Peugeot 206. (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 206. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Peugeot 206 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Peugeot | Chevrolet |
Model | 206 | Malibu |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |