2005 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville (205 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville (313 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Pontiac Bonneville | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Pontiac | Holden |
Model | Bonneville | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |