2005 Pontiac Bonneville vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse

To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Buick LaCrosse. (182 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 2012 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 72 kg more than 2005 Pontiac Bonneville.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Bonneville (313 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Buick LaCrosse. (233 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Buick LaCrosse.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Pontiac Bonneville 2012 Buick LaCrosse
Make Pontiac Buick
Model Bonneville LaCrosse
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3786 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 205 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 313 Nm 233 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1668 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Length 5150 mm 5001 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1857 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1504 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2837 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.1 L/100km 6.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 59 L