2005 Pontiac Grand Am vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Grand Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Grand Am would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 185 more horse power than 2005 Pontiac Grand Am. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Pontiac Grand Am.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Pontiac Grand Am. (279 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Pontiac Grand Am.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Pontiac Grand Am | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Pontiac | Holden |
Model | Grand Am | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 279 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |