2005 Pontiac Montana vs. 2009 Renault Modus
To start off, 2009 Renault Modus is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Pontiac Montana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Pontiac Montana would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (200 HP) has 103 more horse power than 2009 Renault Modus. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Modus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 821 kg more than 2009 Renault Modus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Modus. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Modus. 2005 Pontiac Montana has automatic transmission and 2009 Renault Modus has manual transmission. 2009 Renault Modus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Pontiac Montana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Pontiac Montana | 2009 Renault Modus | |
Make | Pontiac | Renault |
Model | Montana | Modus |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5230 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 49 L |