2005 Porsche 911 vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk

To start off, 2005 Porsche 911 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Porsche 911 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Porsche 911 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk.

Because 2005 Porsche 911 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Porsche 911 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Porsche 911 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
Make Porsche Studebaker
Model 911 Sky Hawk
Year Released 2005 1958
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 3600 cc 2779 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 445 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5150 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1300 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2980 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]