2005 Proton 400 vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C70 weights approximately 768 kg more than 2005 Proton 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Proton 400. 2010 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 2005 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 2005 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Proton 400 | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Proton | Volvo |
Model | 400 | C70 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 108 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2639 mm |